Thursday, September 3, 2026

Legal Injustice

Why are lawyers even a thing, and why do they make millions; why would anybody not be able to seek justice for not being able to afford one? What is the point of the law if you need a priestly class to interoperate legal text? The law should just be the law, but it isn't. Legal injustice is another racket.

A statute of limitations - A statute of limitations is a law that sets the maximum time limit after an event or crime within which legal proceedings or lawsuits must be started; so basically people can just get away with crimes. This happened outrageously when lawsuit was filed by two individuals against the Archdiocese of Baltimore, Cardinal William H. Keeler, Christian Richter the school gynecologist (?) and father Maskell; the lawsuit was dismissed as the authorities in the state and the courts believed that that this whole thing was past the statute of limitations. Still, the lawsuit included the following descriptions: ''Joseph Maskell subjected the girls to repeated sexual, physical, and psychological abuse including vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, vaginal penetration with a vibrator, administration of enemas, hypnosis, threats of physical violence, coerced prostitution and other lewd acts, physically striking the plaintiff to perform sexual acts with a police officer.''

Presidential pardon - Plus the usually corrupt President can exonerate criminals at will.

The spaghetti judgement - In 1996, the judge who had initially been assigned to the Marc Dutroux pedo ring, Jean-Marc Conrote, was removed from the investigation. Jean-Marc had attended a charity dinner for the families of Dutroux's victims. The Belgian political judicial system ruled  that because Jean had attended a dinner with the victims, he could no longer serve on the team due to concerns about his impartiality. They said that because John had received a pen and a plate of spaghetti as a gift at the dinner, he was being bribed. This has come to be known as The Spaghetti Judgment. Even though 400,000 poeple gathered to protest in Brussels, Judge Conrote, was replaced by Judge Jacques Langlois was assigned afterwards. Judge Connerot, was supposedly going to testify that there were murder plots meant to stop the investigation into Michel Nahoul as well. And on August 16th, 1996, Michel Nahoul had been arrested on suspicion of conspiracy. He was arrested only three days after Marc Dutroux, Michel Lelievre, and Michel, after Marc and his accomplice had given statements implicating him in the crimes.

There are many cases where the legal system doesn't just fail to protect people, but serve to shield dangerous criminals from prosecution to such a point that Western countries become can be considered terror-states.

________________________________________________________________________________

By: Otto Heckel

No comments:

Post a Comment

Legal Injustice