Fake Environmentalism

Wild life reserves - In America, national parks get shut down and turned into wild life reserves under environmental pretexts so the Park Service and other organizations and personally profit from it, or so they can set it aside as calateral for foreign debt. This is in legacy of the Beauro of Indian affairs (BIA) which was moved out of the War Department into the Department of Interior. Instead of killing Indians to steal their land, they did so by under a invironmental or scientific pretext. At the same time the Forest reserve (West) and the Park Service (East) became a thing to do the same.

Delta Smelt - In California, the government turned off the water in Central Valley to protect the Delta Smelt, not even indiginous to the area. The real reason was to knock out small farming, which took a 20% hit.

Cape Hatteras Erosion - Over a third of North Carolina tourism is (was) the outer banks, but six of the seven county commissioners live in the mainland and are all business owners, so they have an incentive to draw traffick inland. Cape Hatteras coastlines, mainly Rodanthe and Buxton, have sunk and continue to sink due man made erosion caused by dreding of Oregan Inlit, the Park Service burning scrub, which holds dunes together, and the navy filling in a swamp to build a now abandoned base which is leaking oil. The jetties are broken and can't be rebuild because of environmental groups. Beforehand the beaches were closed to protect the Piping Plover, which went down in numbers anyway because when peopel left, predators returned.

Recycling - There aer only two types of recyclable plastic in the US, PET #1 and HDPE #2. Everything else either produces too many toxins or falls apart in the recycling process. Only about 9% of plastic gets recycle. The rest gets diverted elsewhere, sometimes burried to decompose in 500 years, dumped in endless trash heaps in India, or burned at six times the rate plastic is recycled in the US.

Nuclear energy stigma - The American made Israeli released Stuxnet virus, meant to target Iranian nuclear centrifuges, broke out, also effecting German nuclear power plants. They never bothered reopining them after the accident, if that was even accident at all, siting environmentalism. They also closed down pipelines they had already paid for under the same initiative.

Generating nuclear energy from malten salt and thorium would last thousands of years and would make electricity, which would make electric cars more viable. Electric cars also require rare earth metals for their batteries, one of the waste products for the digging of which is thorium, so it feeds into itself. Nuclear energy is especially effective for ships, which use controlled nuclear fission to produce heat, creating steam to drive turbines for propulsion or electricity.

Global Warming

Incentives - The government uses taxes to subsidise ESG (Environmental Social Governance) companies which get invested in by companies like Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, Twitter, Truist Bank. Blackrock and Vangaurd who get foreknowlege of from people like the Polosis, suggest to and manage these investments for said companies. ESG products cost more to produce and buy then the energy they produce, and because subsadies are removed from gas, the price of gas goes up too. The only people who win are the ESG companies themselves, backed by tax payer dollars.

Pollution in general, which is a very real thing, isn't limited by the government. Instead they impose a carbon tax in exchange for an alotment of how much polution companies are allowed to produce. Same outcome, except the government makes money along the way—plus it costs more for companies to make finished products, meaning they become more expensive for average consumers. Here's the kicker. Smaller businesses who can't pay carbon tax end up selling out to larger corporations who can. The ensuing monopoly also makes the price of consumer products go up as large corporations get richer.

Another effect is that, because wind turbines and solar panels don't produce enough energy, Europe goes to America to buy liquid natural gas. That's why even though America promoted it under biden, Europe used far more green energy, even more so under Trump.

Electric cars use lithium batteries, mining for which emits 5-15 tonnes of Co2 equivalent per tonne of lithium produced. They also require cobolt, the mining for which generates roughly 1.5-1.6 million tonnes of Co2 each year. In addition to hardly producing any energy, wind turbines ruing skylines, displace birds and give bats heart attacks.

Follow the money - The 2015 Global Climate March was sponsored by BMW, Bloomberg and even Haliburton from the Iraq war.

Fake Science

Sea levels - Al Gore's 2006 Inconvenient Truth documentary predicted a 20ft sea level rise in the 'near future.' As of now, this hasn't happened and if it had, it would have effected the $8M beachside property Al bought after the film blew up. What people call sea levels rising is land erosion, which has always been a thing.

In 2009 Al predicted that the North polar ice cap would be ice free within the next 5-7 years. Not only did this not happen, but 2015 represented the largest refreezing in years.

There are 5 times as many polar bears now as there wer in the 70s.

Co2 - Co2 is what plants consume and emit in photosynthasis. Plants operate most efficiently at 12,000 Co2 PPM, which is what it was when they first evolved. This level is also used in green houses. During the Ice Age, the Co2 was 5000 PPM, even though 400 PPM is meant to be an extinction level. Man-made Co2 is only 3.5% of all the Co2 emited each year. Water vapor makes up 95% of green house gases in the atmasphere, which make up only 2% of the total atmasphere. 

Contrary to predictions, in 1998 Co2 levels continued to rise but the global tempetature stayed started to go down. In 2009, leaked emails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit revealed a shift to using the phrase climate change, as aposed to global warming, due to public disallusionment in regards to prior predictions not coming  true in 89. More importantly they showed that in response to this scientists manipulated an upward trend by using proxy data (tree rings) then switching to instrumental data, (thermometers/satellites) the comparison between which can misrepresent averages. They also revealed attempts to get James Sears removed from the editorial board of Geophysical review letters, and a raport between (((Andrew Revkin))) from the NYT.

When this happened, climate sceptic, Stephen McIntyre led a freedom of information campaign for data recorded by the University in partnership with UK Government's Met Office. They claimed that they had lost it however yeas later it turned up, allegedly confirming their global warming trend.

Hocky stick graph - (((Michael E. Mann's))) 1999, hocky stick graph implies a corolation between human carbon emisions and global warming.

But if you look at all of history, you can see that this is anormal cycle which has been going on before humans were on the planet.

Climatology instructor at the University of Winnipeg, Dr. Tim Ball won a law suit against Michael Mann in which he was forced to reveal that the handle of the hockly stick was made up of proxy data, while the blade was instrumental data, a strategy blueprinted in the leaked emails from East Anglia University.

Moreover, Tim Ball radio-carbon-dated a white spruce in the Canandian arctic at 4940 years, which for its dimention at that latitude would have to have been been growing in a world 4 degrees warmer than it is today. This was during the Holocene Climatic Optimum which was a warm period roughly 5,500 years ago

'97% of scientists agree' - This comes from John Cook, who looked at 11,944 acaemic papers.

First of all most of these werent scientists studing climate, and some of them werent scientists at all—but they were arguing the existance of man-made global warming to begin with, which, btw, academics have an incentive to do, partly for climate grants. which have been a thing since the 90s, but also because, those who reject the notion get their papers refused by journals. Later, Proffessor David Legates, former director of the centre for climatic research at the University of Delaware. He found that only 0.3% of the papers explicitely supported the view that current warming was definitel caused by humans.

Senior climate scientist Proffessor Mike Hulme called it ''poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed.'' US scientist Jose Duarte called it completely invalid, untrustworthy and unpublishable. Richard Tol, UN lead author at the house of representatives, who looked at the study in question found that none of the statements in the paper supported data in the actual paper.

________________________________________________________________________________

By: Ryan Dawson, Tim Ball, Jake Tran...

Raped by: Otto Heckel